The Death of the American Dream

Thoughts on Arthur Miller’s classic Americana drama “Death of a Salesman.”

I keep a stack of classic American literature near my desk. It’s my way to pay tribute to those who walked these United States before me. It’s also a means to expose myself to different genres and writing styles.

Death of a Salesman” is written as a script for a theater play by infamous playwright Arthur Asher Miller. It centers around a middle-aged traveling salesman, Willy Loman, who is mentally disintegrating over his failed attempts to achieve the American Dream. The play’s structure is fluid and shifts abruptly between past, present, and ongoing or concluded stages of his life. I understand this to be used as a stylistic technique to demonstrate the mental breakdown of the main protagonist, Willy Loman, as the play unfolds. While this style is potent to make a point, it struck me as disruptive to my reading flow. Scripts require the reader to factor in the playwright’s scene interpretations, which adds a layer of complexity that I didn’t particularly enjoy.

The play is divided into two acts. Neither act has a headline, so bear with me as I label them:

Act 1: Willy’s Dreams Fade Away
Act 2: Willy’s Descent Into Delusion

Willy appears to suffer from burnout after a failed business trip. When he seeks to alleviate his pain by scaling back on work-related travel, he fails to convince his boss and gets himself laid off. This fuels his deteriorating mental state, which clings to the illusions of material success and his lack thereof. His overwhelming nostalgia makes him compare his children’s failures with his own, creating a deeply strained relationship with his sons that eventually culminates in confrontation and disappointment. It ends, of course, in tragedy.

This was a challenging read. Piecing together the puzzle that is Willy Loman’s mind is no easy feat, but, I think, it’s an analogy of the challenges we face in our own lives. The play reminded me of the actor Jim Carry’s father, who took a job he didn’t like to support a life he didn’t enjoy only to be let go at the age of 51. Arthur Miller described, in quite a similar fashion, this tragedy of our society that most of us live sad lives of quiet desperation to emulate, integrate, and do as we are told. It’s a cautionary tale and a bleak reminder of the stoic truth that death isn’t in the future but we die a little bit every day. Is it really worthwhile to spend your life living other people’s dreams? Death of a Salesman, like it or not, is an impetus to shift your thinking towards finding and pursuing your values and prioritize meaning over comfort.

W34Y23 Weekly Review: RNC v Google, Roblox, and US v SpaceX

+++Court Ruled Google Cannot Be Held Liable by RNC over SPAM Filter Policies
+++Roblox Accused of Enabling Child Gambling in Lawsuit Filed by Parents
+++The United States sues Elon Musk’s SpaceX over Hiring Discrimination Practices 

Court Ruled Google Cannot Be Held Liable by RNC over SPAM Filter Policies

The Republican National Committee failed to convince a Court that Google intentionally or negligently redirected Republican fundraising emails to its users’ spam folder costing the party hundreds of thousands of dollars in potential, political donations. A U.S. District Court Judge dismissed the RNC’s legal action as a matter of law; Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shields Google from liability and the RNC failed to substantiate “bad faith” on Google’s part. Google stated its spam filter policies apply equally to all senders of emails. The RNC is allowed to amend its initial complaint.    

Read the full report on washingtonpost.com.
Read the full report on arstechnica.com
Read the case Republican National Committee v. Google Inc, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, No. 2:22-cv-01904.

Roblox Accused of Enabling Child Gambling in Lawsuit filed by Parents

The parents of two minors have filed a lawsuit against game creation platform Roblox accusing Roblox of unlawfully enticing and facilitating child gambling. The plaintiffs claim that Roblox allows third-party gambling websites to use their platform to accept online bets using their virtual currency, Robux, on casino-style games. This is said to be in violation of Roblox’s own terms of service that prohibit simulated gambling. The lawsuit asserts that Roblox users, often children and minors, purchase Robux through the platform, and then link their Robux wallet to these external gambling sites, where Robux is converted into gambling credits. Roblox stated its commitment to combating such activities and it is maintaining a safe online experience for its users.

Read the full report on techcrunch.com.
Read the case Colvin v. Roblox Corporation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-04146.

The United States sues Elon Musk’s SpaceX over Hiring Discrimination Practices 

The U.S. Justice Department has filed a lawsuit against SpaceX, owned by Elon Musk, for allegedly engaging in discriminatory hiring practices against asylum recipients and refugees. The lawsuit asserts that from September 2018 to May 2022, SpaceX discouraged and refused to consider asylum recipients and refugees for employment based on their citizenship status, which violates the Immigration and Nationality Act. SpaceX incorrectly cited export control laws to claim it could only hire U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents in job postings and public statements. The lawsuit also points to CEO Elon Musk’s online statements as examples of discriminatory behavior. The lawsuit seeks back pay, policy changes, and civil penalties to ensure compliance with non-discrimination regulations. SpaceX claims the lawsuit is politically motivated and defends its practices based on international arms trafficking law.

Read the full press release by the Department of Justice.
Read the full report on bloomberg
Read the full report on reuters
Read the complaint United States of America v. Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review (8 U.S.C. § 1324b)

More Headlines

  • Digital Services Act: “Big Tech isn’t ready for landmark EU rules that take effect tomorrow” (by ArsTechnica)
  • Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act: “YouTube Accused of Violating Pact Against Tracking Kids for Ads” (by Bloomberg Law)
  • Copyright Law: “Studios’ Offer to Writers May Lead to AI-Created Scripts That Are Copyrightable” (by The Hollywood Reporter)
  • Motor Vehicle Owners’ Right to Repair Act: “A Controversial Right-to-Repair Car Law Makes a Surprising U-Turn” (by Wired)

In Other News (or publications you should read)

  • Richard Allen’s regulate.tech blog: How to regulate the internet without breaking it
  • Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, Jack Goldsmith’s lawfare: Hard national security choices 
  • Julie Zerbo’s the fashion law (TFL)
  • Justin Hendrix’ tech policy press: technology and democracy.

This post originated from my publication Codifying Chaos.

W33Y23 Weekly Review: Google, NYT v OpenAI, and NetChoice

+++ Class Action Lawsuit against Google over Consumer Browser Privacy Continues
+++ The New York Times is Considering a Lawsuit against OpenAI over AI Training Practices
+++ Technology Lobbying Group sues Arkansas Lawmakers over new Child Protection Law 

Class Action Lawsuit against Google over Consumer Browser Privacy Continues

Google is accused of leveraging its suite of products, analytics, cookies, and apps to collect user data and behavior even when users operate in incognito mode or other private mode settings that suggest user privacy. The lawsuit seeks at least $5,000 of damages per user for violations of federal wiretapping and California privacy laws. On Monday, Google failed to dismiss the legal action, which could run up to $5 billion in damages, when a U.S. District Court Judge ruled Google failed to provide information about its data collection practices. In particular, how it handles users’ browser and search history.        

Read the full report on reuters.com.
Read the case Brown et al v Google LLC et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 20-03664. 

The New York Times is Considering a Lawsuit against OpenAI over AI Training Practices

Anonymous sources for NPR imply the New York Times will take legal action against OpenAI for copyright infringement. Allegedly, negotiations between the media conglomerate and the AI research lab to use news reporting content as training data for AI models are stalling. OpenAI’s practice to scrape data from publicly available sources on the internet, including NYT content, could be considered outside the fair use doctrine, allowing content creators to appropriate copyrighted works provided the new content is transformative.   

Read the full report on npr.org.

Technology Lobbying Group sues Arkansas Lawmakers over new Child Protection Law 

Arkansas legislators passed the “Social Media Safety Act”, a new regulation that requires social media companies to perform age verification checks on new users. If a user is under the legal age of 18, the law requires parental consent and social media companies must obtain it. Otherwise, minors in Arkansas are prohibited from becoming account holders on social media platforms. A lobbying group founded in 2001 representing multinational technology companies Amazon, Google, Meta (i.e. Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Threads, etc), TikTok, and X among others filed suit challenging the new regulation stating “SB396 imposes onerous obligations on social media companies that severely burden both minors’ and adults’ First Amendment rights to speak, listen, and associate without government interference on the widely used online services that it covers.” The SB396 is set to go into effect on Sept. 1.

Read the full report on ap.com.
Read the full text of Senate Bill 396.
Read the case NetChoice v. Attorney General Tim Griffin, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, No. 5:23-cv-05105-TLB D. 

In Other News (or things you should read)

  • Richard Allen’s regulate.tech blog: How to regulate the internet without breaking it
  • Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, Jack Goldsmith’s lawfare: Hard national security choices 
  • Julie Zerbo’s the fashion law (TFL)
  • Justin Hendrix’ tech policy press: technology and democracy.

This post originated from my publication Codifying Chaos.

W32Y23 Weekly Review: Tetris, Silverman, and California

+++ Book Author Accuses Apple and the Tetris Company of Copyright Infringement over Tetris Movie
+++ Deep Dive into Sarah Silverman’s Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Meta over Copyright Infringement
+++ California Lawmakers debate new Regulations to Increase Child Saftey on Social Media

Book Author Accuses Apple and the Tetris Company of Copyright Infringement over Tetris Movie

Dan Ackerman, the author of the book “The Tetris Effect: The Game that Hypnotized the World” filed a federal lawsuit against Apple and the Tetris Company among others alleging copyright infringement for turning his book, which was published in 2016, into a biographical thriller that premiered in 2023.  

Read the full report on reuters.com.
Read the case Ackerman v. Pink, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:23-cv-06952. 

Deep Dive into Sarah Silverman’s Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Meta over Copyright Infringement

Sarah Silverman, the comedian best known for her stand-up routines, filed a federal lawsuit against OpenAI and Meta among others alleging copyright infringement for using the content of her book “Bedwetter: Stories of Courage, Redemption, and Pee” to train and improve the large-language models (LLMs) used for ChatGPT and Meta’s LLaMA. Vulture and attorney Matthew Butterick discuss the impact of the lawsuit on secrecy around artificial intelligence algorithms stating the “lawsuits could potentially lift the veil on how these systems work.” They review defendants’ arguments building upon the landmark decision in Authors Guild v. Google Inc, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 15-849, which ruled Google’s practice to copy books and show excerpts to users was permissible as long as the generated copy was bought and paid for. 

Read the full report on vulture.com.
Read the case Silverman v. OpenAI, Inc., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-03416 

California Lawmakers debate new Regulations to Increase Child Saftey on Social Media

California legislators are striving to enhance social media safety for youth by introducing bills like SB680, which seeks to prosecute platforms for promoting harmful content related to self-harm, illegal substances, and more. Another bill, AB1394, requires social media firms to provide reporting options for child sexual abuse content. Additionally, AB2273 aims to create age-appropriate design standards. These efforts reflect concerns about mental health impacts and safety for young users, although opposition from tech groups over potential free speech implications remains.

Read the full report on latimes.com
Read the full text of Senate Bill 680.
Read the full text of Assembly Bill 1394.
Read the full text of Assembly Bill 2273

In Other News (or things you should read)

  • Richard Allen’s regulate.tech blog: How to regulate the internet without breaking it
  • Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, Jack Goldsmith’s lawfare: Hard national security choices 
  • Julie Zerbo’s the fashion law (TFL)

This post originated from my publication Codifying Chaos.

Welcome, Welcome To Codifying Chaos

With a new mission, I repurpose the codifying chaos publication to cover legal news.

The original thought process behind codifying chaos stems from previous work on mitigating legal risk and creating legal processes to ease regulatory pressure for companies. While I still believe codifying chaos is a versatile term, it will revert back to this original purpose to cover legal news, developments within the regulatory and legal landscape, and legal tech.

Lastly, the underlying startup of this publication is Savigny Inc. I will write more about it as the company continues to grow. Founding a business is a journey of people. Allow me to get to know you better by sending an email to andy@cedarbaygroup.com or message me on X (fka Twitter).

On Zig Ziglar

Specifically his classic book “Secrets of Closing the Sale.” Is it really for anyone? I read it as part of my installment on selling stuff, so you don’t have to.

Hillary Hinton “Zig” Ziglar had a widespread influence as a motivational speaker and author. Among his many accomplishments was the induction into the National Speakers Association Hall of Fame. In his book “Secrets of Closing the Sale” he describes essential techniques of salesmanship. Published in 1984, the book provides practical advice and strategies for effectively closing sales and building strong customer relationships. Ziglar’s content is heavily centered around a motivational approach to help sales professionals improve their skills and achieve greater success. The book covers a range of topics related to the sales process, including understanding customer needs, building rapport, handling objections, and ultimately guiding potential customers to make buying decisions. Ziglar emphasizes the importance of ethical selling and creating win-win situations, where both the customer and the salesperson benefit.

Ziglar’s writing style has elements of the stereotypical, obnoxious salesman. At times, it was hard to finish a sentence and I quickly developed sympathy for anyone ever shutting the door on him. While the formatting and structure of the book are clear and concise, I found his ramblings wrapped in dragged-out stories to be a disservice to his own message. Calling potential buyers or prospects names like “Gary Gullible” or “Hostile Helen” illustrate the underlying arrogance of his approach. With all that in mind, a reader interested in a blend of laissez-faire and frat-boy sales styles will find one or two techniques useful. Another positive about this book is the aforementioned formatting and structure which allows for quick access and can be helpful in specific situations. It’s certainly a book that can start at any chapter.

Would I recommend it? No. The book nears its 50th anniversary. While I believe the essential content is still applicable in today’s society, I found more contemporary reads more insightful.